(Picture courtesy of Jeremy Brown)
Please download the following files:
QUESTIONS:
View the alignment in Jalview or your favourite alignment viewer.
Can you identify the gene boundary from the viewer? Does it roughly match the partition file?
Is there missing data? Do you think if missing data can be problematic?
You can now start to reconstruct a maximum-likelihood (ML) tree for the Turtle data set (assuming that you are in the same folder where the alignment is stored):
iqtree2 -s turtle.fa -B 1000 -T AUTO
Options explained:
-s turtle.fa
to specify the input alignment as turtle.fa
.-B 1000
to specify 1000 replicates for the ultrafast bootstrap (Minh et al., 2013).-T AUTO
to determine the best number of CPU cores to speed up the analysis.This simple command will perform three important steps in one go:
Once the run is done, IQ-TREE will write several output files including:
turtle.fa.iqtree
: the main report file that is self-readable. You should look at this file to see the computational results. It also contains a textual representation of the final tree.turtle.fa.treefile
: the ML tree in NEWICK format, which can be visualized in FigTree or any other tree viewer program.turtle.fa.log
: log file of the entire run (also printed on the screen).turtle.fa.ckp.gz
: checkpoint file used to resume an interrupted analysis.QUESTIONS:
Look at the report file
turtle.fa.iqtree
.What is the best-fit model name? What do you know about this model? (see substitution models available in IQ-TREE)
What are the AIC/AICc/BIC scores of this model and tree?
Look at the tree in
turtle.fa.iqtree
or visualise the treeturtle.fa.treefile
in a tree viewer software like FigTree. What relationship among three trees does this tree support?What is the ultrafast bootstrap support (%) for the relevant clade?
Does this tree agree with the published tree (Chiari et al., 2012)?
We now perform a partition model analysis (Chernomor et al., 2016), where one allows each partition to have its own model:
iqtree2 -s turtle.fa -p turtle.nex -B 1000 -T AUTO
Options explained:
-p turtle.nex
to specify an edge-linked proportional partition model (Chernomor et al., 2016). That means, there is one set of branch lengths. But each partition can have proportionally shorter or longer tree length, representing slow or fast evolutionary rate, respectively.QUESTIONS:
Look at the report file
turtle.nex.iqtree
. What are the AIC/AICc/BIC scores of partition model? Is it better than the previous model?Look at the tree in
turtle.nex.iqtree
or visualizeturtle.nex.treefile
in FigTree. What relationship among three trees does this tree support?What is the ultrafast bootstrap support (%) for the relevant clade?
Does this tree agree with the published tree (Chiari et al., 2012)?
We now perform the PartitionFinder algorithm (Lanfear et al., 2012) that tries to merge partitions to reduce the potential over-parameterization:
iqtree2 -s turtle.fa -p turtle.nex -B 1000 -T AUTO -m MFP+MERGE -rcluster 10 --prefix turtle.merge
Options explained:
-m MFP+MERGE
to perform PartitionFinder followed by tree reconstruction.-rcluster 10
to reduce computations by only examining the top 10% partitioning schemes using the relaxed clustering algorithm (Lanfear et al., 2014).--prefix turtle.merge
to set the prefix for all output files as turtle.merge.*
. This is to avoid overwriting outputs from the previous analysis.QUESTIONS:
Look at the report file
turtle.merge.iqtree
. How many partitions do we have now?Look at the AIC/AICc/BIC scores. Compared with two previous models, is this model better or worse?
Look at the tree in
turtle.merge.iqtree
or visualizeturtle.merge.treefile
in FigTree. What relationship among three trees does this tree support?What is the ultrafast bootstrap support (%) for the relevant clade?
Does this tree agree with the published tree (Chiari et al., 2012)?
We now want to know whether the trees inferred for the Turtle data set have significantly different log-likelihoods or not. This can be conducted with the SH test (Shimodaira and Hasegawa, 1999), or expected likelihood weights (Strimmer and Rambaut, 2002).
First, concatenate the trees constructed by single and partition models into one file:
For Linux/MacOS:
cat turtle.fa.treefile turtle.nex.treefile >turtle.trees
For Windows:
type turtle.fa.treefile turtle.nex.treefile >turtle.trees
Now pass this file into IQ-TREE via -z
option:
iqtree2 -s turtle.fa -p turtle.merge.best_scheme.nex -z turtle.trees -zb 10000 -au -n 0 --prefix turtle.test
Options explained:
-p turtle.merge.best_scheme.nex
to provide the best partitioning scheme found previously to avoid running ModelFinder again.-z turtle.trees
to input a set of trees.-zb 10000
to specify 10000 replicates for approximate boostrap for tree topology tests.-au
is to perform the Approximately Unbiased test.-n 0
to avoid tree search and just perform tree topology tests.--prefix turtle.test
to set the prefix for all output files as turtle.test.*
.QUESTIONS:
Look at the
USER TREES
section in the report fileturtle.test.iqtree
. Which tree has worse log-likelihood?Can you reject this tree according to the Shimodaira Hasegawa test, assuming a p-value cutoff of 0.05?
Can you reject this tree according to the Approximately Unbiased test, assuming a p-value cutoff of 0.05?
HINTS:
-
sign).Now we want to investigate the cause for such topological difference between trees inferred by single and partition model. One way is to identify genes contributing most phylogenetic signal towards one tree but not the other.
How can one do this? We can look at the gene-wise log-likelihood (logL) differences between the two given trees T1 and T2. Those genes having the largest logL(T1)-logL(T2) will be in favor of T1. Whereas genes showing the largest logL(T2)-logL(T1) are favoring T2.
To compute gen-wise log-likelihoods for the two trees, you can use the -wpl
option (for writing partition log-likelihoods):
iqtree2 -s turtle.fa -p turtle.nex.best_scheme.nex -z turtle.trees -n 0 -wpl --prefix turtle.wpl
will write a file turtle.wpl.partlh
, that contains log-likelihoods for all partitions in the original partition file. We use -p turtle.nex.best_scheme.nex
here (instead of -p turtle.nex
) to avoid doing model selection again.
Import turtle.wpl.partlh
into MS Excel, Libre Office Calc, or any other spreadsheet software. You will need to tell the software to treat spaces as delimiters, so that the values are imported into different columns for easy processing (e.g., doing log-likelikehood subtraction as pointed out above).
QUESTIONS:
Compute the gene-wise log-likelihood differences between two trees.
What is the name of the gene showing the largest log-likelihood difference between two trees?
What is the name of the gene showing the second largest log-likelihood difference between two trees?
Were these two genes identified in (Brown and Thomson, 2016)?
Briefly describe what is the problem of these two genes?
We now try to construct a tree without these “influential” genes. To do so, copy the partition file turtle.nex
to a new file and remove the lines defining the charset
of these genes, and then repeat the IQ-TREE run with a parititon model (see section 4). You will need to figure out a command line to run IQ-TREE yourself here.
QUESTIONS:
Document which command line did you use to run IQ-TREE?
What tree topology do you get now?
What is the ultrafast bootstrap support (%) for the relevant clade?
Does this tree agree with the published tree (Chiari et al., 2012)?
NOTE: This question is optional, ignore if you don’t have time to finish.
So far we have assumed that gene trees and species tree are equal. However, it is well known that gene trees might be discordant. Therefore, we now want to quantify the agreement between gene trees and species tree in a so-called concordance factor (Minh et al., 2020).
You first need to compute the gene trees, one for each partition separately:
iqtree2 -s turtle.fa -S turtle.nex --prefix turtle.loci -T 2
Options explained:
-S turtle.nex
to tell IQ-TREE to infer separate trees for every partition in turtle.nex
. All output files are similar to a partition analysis, except that the tree turtle.loci.treefile
now contains a set of gene trees.Definitions:
Gene concordance factor (gCF) is the percentage of decisive gene trees concordant with a particular branch of the species tree (0% <= gCF(b) <= 100%). gCF=0% means that branch b does not occur in any gene trees, whereas gCF=100% means that branch b occurs in every gene tree.
Site concordance factor (sCF) is the percentage of decisive (parsimony informative) alignment sites supporting a particular branch of the species tree (~33% <= sCF(b) <= 100%). sCF<33% means that another discordant branch b’ is more supported, whereas sCF=100% means that branch b is supported by all sites.
CAUTION when gCF ~ 0% or sCF < 33%, even if boostrap supports are ~100%!
GREAT when gCF and sCF > 50% (i.e., branch is supported by a majority of genes and sites).
You can now compute gCF and sCF for the tree inferred under the partition model:
iqtree2 -t turtle.nex.treefile --gcf turtle.loci.treefile -s turtle.fa --scf 100
Options explained:
-t turtle.nex.treefile
to specify a species tree. We use tree under the partitioned model here, but you can of course use the other tree.--gcf turtle.loci.treefile
to specify a gene-trees file.--scf 100
to draw 100 random quartets when computing sCF.Once finished this run will write several files:
turtle.nex.treefile.cf.tree
: tree file where branches are annotated with bootstrap/gCF/sCF values.turtle.nex.treefile.cf.stat
: a table file with various statistics for every branch of the tree.Similarly, you can compute gCF and sCF for the tree under unpartitioned model:
iqtree2 -t turtle.fa.treefile --gcf turtle.loci.treefile -s turtle.fa --scf 100
QUESTIONS:
Visualise
turtle.nex.treefile.cf.tree.nex
in FigTree.Explore gene concordance factor (gCF), gene discordance factors (gDF1, gDF2, gDFP), site concordance factor (sCF) and site discordance factors (sDF1, sDF2).
How do gCF and sCF values look compared with bootstrap supports?
Visualise
turtle.fa.treefile.cf.tree
. How do these values look like now on the contradicting branch?
FINAL QUESTIONS:
- Given all analyses you have done in this tutorial, which relationship between Turtle, Crocodile and Bird is true in your opinion?